Digital Transformation: Quality First or Technology First?
- Development
- Catarina Sabbadim
We’re seeing technology becoming increasingly important in people’s daily lives. At T2M, we’re constantly immersed in projects that seek to stay ahead of the curve, improve processes, and reduce costs — and one thing is becoming increasingly clear: technology doesn’t solve everything.
The question “quality or technology first?” seems simple, but it carries important implications that can delay digital transformation and technological evolution.
It’s very common to see initial excitement when learning a new tool or encountering a potential technological innovation. This, in itself, is a great thing. It’s important to always strive for improvements in everyday life. But when excitement comes before understanding the processes and user needs, it can become a trap.
This often happens in projects where innovation is the team’s top priority. They’re more interested in starting development than “digging deeper into the solution.” Development begins, architecture and tool definition are decided on the fly, the process doesn’t follow a logical path, and as a result, the technology fails to deliver real value to the client. And the project ends up having to take a step back. Only when quality concepts are incorporated — where user pain points are understood, expectations are aligned, and the process is restored — is it possible to move forward solidly.
Quality is about clarity, consistent delivery, and validation. When the foundation is well-structured, technology becomes an ally. Quality isn’t there to solve chaos — it’s there to scale what already works. But how do you implement quality in practice?
There are some steps that help to make quality the main pillar, in a simple and effective way:
1. Understand the problem before the solution
Establish conversations with users, stakeholders, and the team involved. Seek to understand their pain points, potential bottlenecks, and what truly needs to be addressed.
2. Document objectives clearly
Establish the criteria to be met: what needs to be delivered, to whom, why, and how it will be validated, in addition to documenting deadlines and risks.
3. Design the process before the tool
Try to design the ideal tool flow before choosing the technology, trying to adapt it to the process.
4. Validate small deliveries constantly
Don’t wait until everything is ready to test. Validate with the user for each release, even a small one. This avoids surprises and changes at the end.
5. Measure what matters
Create quality indicators, such as user satisfaction, response time, and error rate, considering whatever is most relevant to the context.
According to Che et al (2023), companies that demonstrated some level of involvement in quality management initiatives showed superior performance in the quality of their products, compared to those that did not participate in these activities, concluding that companies can improve product quality with digitalization and connection between departments.
Although it seems contradictory, product quality was higher in companies that partially collaborated on quality initiatives compared to those that fully collaborated. This suggests that excessively broadening participation can dilute the effectiveness of quality communication, weakening its positive effects (CHE et al, 2023).
Digital transformation is indeed about technology. But, above all, it’s about culture, processes, and people. Technology can’t transform itself. It’s important to understand that quality is essential to a project. However, it can’t deliver on its own. In our experience, quality does come first. It helps prioritize, choose the right activity, at the right time, for the right problem. It paves the way for technology to move forward. And when they work hand in hand, that’s when true transformation happens.
References
CHE, Tong; CAI, Jingxuan; YANG, Rui; LAI, Fujun. Digital transformation drives product quality improvement: an organizational transparency perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 197, p. 102803, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.102803. Accessed on: 23 jun. 2025.